Comparative Analytical Study of Dinoprostone Gel and Hyaluronidase Injection for Induction of Labour in Term Primigravida in Tertiary Rural Medical Centre of Western Uttar Pradesh
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of intracervical dinoprostone gel and hyaluronidase injection for induction of labour in term primigravida.
Materials and methods: This is a hospital based analytical prospective interventional study conducted in a rural tertiary care centre over a period of 18 months. A total of 70 patients who required induction of labour for one or another reason with Bishop score of less than 6 were included in the study. All the cases were randomly divided into two groups, Group A received dinoprostone gel and Group B received hyaluronidase injection. Chi square test & unpaired T test were applied for statistical analysis.
Results: Time interval from induction to active phase of labour was comparatively shorter in group A than in group B (10.74 ± 6.17 vs 15.94 ± 7.1) and the difference was significant (p= 0.001). Time interval from induction to delivery time was comparatively shorter in group A than group B (14.84 ± 8.86 vs 21.33 ± 7.86) and difference was significant (P= 0.009). Maternal complications were more common in group A as compared to group B.
Conclusion: This study showed that labour could be accelerated significantly by intracervical injection of hyaluronidase. Hyaluronidase injection has less maternal and fetal side-effects as compared to dinoprostone gel and can be a good choice for induction of labour.
2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of Labour. Evidence based clinical guideline No9. London: RCOG Press; 2001: 1-90.
3. Yawn BP, Wollan P, McKeon K, Field CS. Temporal changes in rates and reasons for medical induction of term labor, 1980-1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 611-9.
4. Li WJ, Li ZL, Ha KW. Effect of hyaluronidase on cervical ripening. Chin Med J (Engl) 1994; 107: 552-3.
5. Kandemir O, Dede H, Yalvac S, Aldemir O, Yirci B, Yerebasmaz N, et al. The effect of parity on labour induction with prostaglandin E2 analogue: an evaluation of 2090 cases. Journal of Pregnancy and Child Health 2015; 02: 2-5.
6. Saleh HS, Elsayad AH, Mahfouz EM, Abdelsalam WA. Low doses of misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for Induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancy. Journal of women’s Health care 2019; 8: 1000457.
7. Bashutheen N S, Sharon M. A study of intracervical PGE2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labour. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research 2018; 5: C4- C7.
8. Parate S, Fidvi J. A comparative study of single and double dose of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening. International Journal of Medical Research & Review 2015; 3: 484-9.
9. Mukhopadhyay M, Lim KJ, Fairlie FM. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22: 294-5
10. Bernstein P, Leyland N, Gurland P, Gare D. Cervical repening and labor induction with prostaglandin E2 gel: A placebo-controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 336-40.
11. Ramya D, Jaju PB. Comparative study of Intra-Vaginal Misoprostol with Intra-Cervical Dinoprostone Gel for Induction of Labour. Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal 2017; 6: 135-42.
12. Surita FG, Cecatti JG, Parpinelli MA, Krupa F, Pinto E
Silva JL. Hyaluronidase versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in high-risk term and post term pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 88: 258-64.
13. Priya R, Devi I, Devi S. The study of local injection of hyaluronidase on cervical dilation in labour- an observational study. International Journal of clinical Obstetrics and Gyynaecology 2020; 4: 242-5.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 16, No 3 (September 2022) | |
Section | Original Articles | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v16i3.10577 | |
Keywords | ||
Induction of Labour Dinoprostone Gel Intracervical Hyaluronidase Injection Bishop Score |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |