Journal of Family and Reproductive Health 2015. 9(1):35-40.

A Comparative Study on Knowledge about Reproductive Health among Urban and Rural Women of Bangladesh.
Monoarul Haque, Sharmin Hossain, Kazi Rumana Ahmed, Taslima Sultana, Hasina Akhter Chowdhury, Jesmin Akter

Abstract


To compare the level of knowledge on reproductive health among urban and rural women of selected area of Bangladesh.A descriptive cross-sectional study was undertaken among 200 women selected purposively from different rural and urban areas of Bangladesh. Data were collected using a semi-structured interviewer-administered questionnaire by face to face interview. Knowledge level was analyzed according to poor, moderate and good knowledge by pre-defined knowledge scoring.Mean age of the respondents was 26 years and majority (66%) of them was housewives. Most of them (61%) had completed their primary level education. Around three-fourth of them belongs to lower-middle income group. Overall level of reproductive health knowledge was more evident among urban reproductive aged women than rural counterparts (p < 0.001). Moreover, significant knowledge gap was found regarding family planning (p = 0.005), care during pregnancy (p < 0.001), safe motherhood (p = 0.002), newborn care (p = 0.009) and birth spacing (p < 0.001) between urban and rural women. Family members were the major source of information in both groups.A wide knowledge gap was found between Bangladeshi urban and rural respondents regarding their reproductive behaviors. Government and concerned organizations should promote and strengthen various health education programs to focus on reproductive health, especially among reproductive aged women in rural area.

Keywords


Knowledge; Reproductive Health

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hasan MK. Reproductive rights and decision-making: A omparative study in rural and urban Bangladesh. Perspectives in Social Sciences 2005; 8: 127-45.

Global Policy Committee of the World Health Organization, 2 May 1994; and the WHO Position paper on health, Population and Development, Cairo 5- 13 September 1994. http://www.who.int/topics eproductive_health/en/

The center for Reproductive Rights: Women of the world, South Asia 2005: 10.

Khan MR. Report on Focus Group Discussion on Maternal Health, Report prepared for UNICEF, Dhaka 1997.

Huq N, Khan M. Menstruation: Beliefs and Practices of Adolescent Girls. Dhaka: Research and Evaluation Division, Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC), 1991: 50-72.

Haque ANMN. The middle-income matrix. The Daily Star. Published On: 2007.

Smith EJ. Protecting fertility Network 2002; 22: 14- 8.

Nazar-Beutelspacher A, Matina-Rosales D, Salvatierra- Ilzaba B, Zapata-Martelo E, Halperrin D. Education and non-use of contraceptives among poor women in Chiapas, Mexico. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1999; 25: 132-8.

Dhaher E. Reproductive health human rights: women's knowledge, attitude, and practices toward their reproductive health rights in Palestine. Bielefeld (Germany): Bielefeld University; 2008.

Marchant T, Mushi A K, Nathan R, Mukasa O, Abdulla S, Lengeler C, et al. Planning a family: Priorities and concerns in rural Tanzania. Afr J Reprod Health 2004; 8: 111-23.

Ndong I, Finger WR. Male responsibility for reproductive health. Introduction. Netw Res Triangle Park N C 1998; 18: 4-6.

Islam MR, Thorvaldsen G. Family planning knowledge and current use of contraception among the Mru indigenous women in Bangladesh: a multivariate analysis. Open Access Journal of Contraception 2012; 3: 9-16.

Oli K. Safe motherhood practices in Rukum. Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal, September 2007.

Rahman A, Katzive L, Henshaw SK. A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985-1997. Int Fam Plann Persp 1998; 24: 56-64.

el-Maaddawi Y, Aboul-Ella MN, Abdel-Moneim MN, antawy AB. Study of the effect of birth spacing on maternal health. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 1992; 67: 725-9.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.