Original Articles

Comparing Formation or Non-Formation of Bladder Flap at Cesarean Section on Perioperative and Postoperative Complications: Double-Blind Clinical Trial

Abstract

Objective: To investigating formation or non-formation of bladder flap at Cesarean section on the complications during and after surgery.
Materials and methods: This is a double-blind clinical trial study conducted during February 2014 to May 2015 on 64 pregnant women with gestational age of 36 weeks or more who were delivered by Cesarean section for the first time. They were randomly divided into two groups (intervention group: non-formation of bladder flap; control group: formation of bladder flap). The time to cut out the baby by Cesarean section, total duration of operation, bladder injury, intraoperative bleeding, hematocrit changes expected prior to during and following operation, postoperative pain, macroscopic and microscopic hematuria, postoperative complications and duration of  hospitalization were compared between two groups. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 16 using and statistics tests. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Time to cut out the baby for the intervention group (124.9 ± 40.5 seconds and for control group 155.1 ± 42.9 seconds) and total duration of the operation (intervention group: 27.7 ± 5.2 min and control group: 34 ± 4.73 min) were significantly different (p = 0.000). Number of gauze consumption during operation and postoperative hematocrit drop in the intervention group was significantly lower in the intervention group compared the control group (p = 0.000). The postoperative pain score in the intervention group (4.8 ± 1.1) and in control group (6.3 ± 0.9) were significantly different (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: Omission of the bladder flap at Cesarean section leads to short-term benefits such as reducing the time to cut out the fetus, duration of surgery, decreasing postoperative bleeding and lowering pain.

Faricy PO, Augspurger RR, Kaufman JM. Bladder injuries associated with cesarean section. J Urol 1978;120:762-3.

Eisenkop SM, Richman R, Platt LD, Paul RH. Urinary tract injury during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:591-6.

Pelosi MA 2nd, Pelosi MA 3rd. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:900.

Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Tinelli R, Rahimi S, Resta L, Tinelli FG. The post-cesarean section symptomatic bladder flap hematoma: a modern reappraisal. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:709-14.

Winsett MZ, Fagan CJ, Bedi DG.Sonographic demonstration of bladder-flap hematoma. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:483-7.

O'Neill HA, Egan G, Walsh CA, Cotter AM, Walsh SR. Omission of the bladder flap at caesarean section reduces delivery time without increased morbidity: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;174:20-6.

Nabhan AF. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;100:69-75.

Cunningham FG, Williams JW. Williams obstetrics. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse D, Spong C. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010:544-64.

Pelosi MA, Ortega I. [Cesarean section: Pelosi's simplified technique]. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 1994;59:372-7.

Mahajan NN. Justifying formation of bladder flap at

cesarean section? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:853-5.

Chigbu CO, Ezeome IV, Iloabachie GC. Non-formation of bladder flap at cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95:284-5.

Hohlagschwandtner M, Ruecklinger E, Husslein P, Joura EA. Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:1089-92.

Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Fogertey P, Roehl K, Stamilio D, Macones GA. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:815-21.

Patolia DS, Hilliard RL, Toy EC, Baker B. Early feeding after cesarean: randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:113-6.

Tran TS, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A. Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:367-71.

Wood RM, Simon H, Oz AU. Pelosi-type vs. traditional

cesarean delivery.A prospective comparison. J Reprod Med 1999;44:788-95.

Rajasekar D, Hall M. Urinary tract injuries during obstetric intervention. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:731-4.

Murphy K. Reducing the complications of caesarean section. Recent Advances in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998;20:141-52.

Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:156-60.

Files
IssueVol 11, No 3 (September 2017) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
Keywords
Bladder Flap Cesarean Section Bladder

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Akhlaghi F, Khazaie A, Jafaripour F. Comparing Formation or Non-Formation of Bladder Flap at Cesarean Section on Perioperative and Postoperative Complications: Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Family Reprod Health. 2017;11(3):152-158.