Original Articles

Comparison Between Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy, a Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravenous and intraperitoneal injection of lidocaine and normal saline in relieving postoperative pain after elective abdominal hysterectomy.
Materials and methods:
For this double-blind randomized controlled study 109 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated to three groups :1) IV group (intravenous injection group) received intravenous lidocaine %2 bolus 1.5mg/kg 30 min before incision and then a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2mg/kg and before the wound closure an intraperitoneal injection of N/S , 2) IP group (intraperitoneal group) received intravenous N/S and intraperitoneal lidocaine 3mg/kg , 3) P group (placebo, N/S) received both intravenous and intraperitoneal N/S. The pain scores (VAS) at rest, total morphine consumption , the time to first need for rescue analgesic ,incidence of lidocaine related adverse effects and nausea and vomiting were recorded at 0,2,4,8,12 and 24 hrs postoperatively.
Results:
The VAS scores were significantly lower in IP and IV groups compared with placebo (p = 0.001). Total consumption of morphine (p = 0.001) and time to firs request of recue analgesic (p = 0.001) were lower too in IP and IV groups.Incidence of vomiting was comparable between groups (p < 0.05) but nausea was higher in control group (p > 0.05).There were not notable lidocaine-related adverse effects. IP and IV groups were not statistically different for all investigated variables.
Conclusion:
This study showed lidocaine administration both intravenously and intraperitoneally are effective in reducing the postoperative pain and also have opioid sparing effect and can be safely used in elective abdominal hysterectomy without any major adverse effects.

Pogatzki-Zahn E, Chandrasena C, Schug SA. Nonopioid analgesics for postoperative pain management. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol 2014; 27: 513-9.

Gottschalk A, Smith DS. New Concepts in Acute Pain Therapy: Preemptive Analgesia. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN 2001; 63: 1979-84.

Miller, Eriksson, Fleisher, Wiener-Kronish, Cohen & Young. Miller's Anesthesia, 2-Volume Set, 8th Edition. Chapter 98. Acute Postoperative Pain. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2010.

White PF. The Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain. AnesthAnalg 2002;94:577-85.

Stanley G, Appadu B, Mead M, Rowbotham DJ. Dose requirements, efficacy and side effects of morphine and pethidine delivered by patient-controlled analgesia after

gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:484–6.

Woodhouse A, Mather LE. The effect of duration of dose delivery with patient-controlled analgesia on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after hysterectomy. Br J ClinPharmacol 1998;45:57–62.

LAURETTI GR. MecanismosEnvolvidosna Analgesia da Lidocaínapor Via Venosa. Mechanisms of Analgesia of Intravenous Lidocaine. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2008; 58: 3: 280-6.

Koppert W1, Ostermeier N, Sittl R, Weidner C, Schmelz M. Low-dose lidocaine reduces secondary hyperalgesia by a central mode of action. Pain 2000;85:217-24.

Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anaesthetic and their present and potential clinical implications. ActaAnaesthesiolScand 2006;50:256-282

Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication?Anesthesiology2000; 93: 858-75.

Kang JG, Kim MH, Kim EH, Lee SH.Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine reduces hospital length of stay following open gastrectomy for stomach cancer in men.J ClinAnest 2012; 24, 465–70.

Kaba A, Detroz BJ, Laurent SR, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Acute rehabilitation programme after laparoscopic colectomy using intravenous lidocaine. ActaChir Belgium 2005; 105: 53-8.

Akahokehr. Intraperitoneal local anesthetic for postoperative pain. Saudi J Anesthe 2013; 7: 5.

Gvozdenović L, Pajtić V, Ivanov D, Cvijanović R, Gavrilović S, Gojković Z, et al.Acute postoperative pain relief, by intraperitoneal application of local anesthetics, during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Health Scien 2011; 1:90-5.

Ng A, Smith G. Intraperitoneal administration of analgesia: is this practice of any utility?Br. J. Anaesth 2002; 89: 535-7.

Bucciero M, Ingelmo PM, Fumagalli R, Noll E, Garbagnati A, Somaini M, et al. Intraperitonealropivacaine nebulization for pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with intraperitoneal instillation. AnesthAnalg 2011;113:1266-71.

Grigoras A, Lee P, Sattar F, Shorten G. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine decreases the incidence of persistent pain after breast surgery. Clin J Pain 2012;28:567–72.

Khan MR, Raza R, Zafar SN, Shamim F, Raza SA, Pal KM, et al. Intraperitoneal lignocaine (lidocaine) versus bupivacaine after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Surgical Research 2012 ;178:662-9.

Williamson KM, Cotton BR, Smith G. Intraperitoneal lignocaine for pain relief after total abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:675-7.

ZmoraO, Stolik-Dollberg O, Bar-Zakai B , Rosin D , Kuriansky J, Shabtai M, et al. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not attenuate pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J SocLaparSurg 2000; 4:301-4.

Donatsky AM,Bjerrum F,Gögenur I .Intraperitoneal instillation of saline and local anesthesia for prevention of shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. SurgiEndos 2013; 27: 2283-92.

Ali PB, Cotton BR,Williamson KM,Smith G. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine or lidocaine does not provide analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. British journal of anesthesia 1998; 80:245-7.

Elfberg BA, Sjövall-Mjöberg S. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled and double-blind study. SurgLaparoscEndoscPercutan Tech 2000;10:357-9.

Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ , Sessler DI, Durieux ME, Lamy ML, et al. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiol2007; 106: 11-8.

Koppert W, Weigand M, Neumann F ,Sittl R, Schuettler J, Schmelz M,et al. Perioperativeintravenous lidocaine has preventive effects on postoperativepain and morphine consumption after major abdominalsurgery. AnesthAnalg2004; 98: 1050-5.

Baral BK,Bhattarai BK, Rahman TR, Singh SN, Regmi R. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Nepal Med Coll J 2010; 12: 215-20.

Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP,Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, et al. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. AnesthAnalg1998; 86: 235-9.

Gupta A, Perniola A, Axelsson K, Thorn SE, Crafoord K, Rawal N.Postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy: A double-blind comparison between placebo and local anesthetic infused intraperitoneally.AnesthAnalg 2004;99:1173–9.

El-Sherbiny W, Saber W, Askalany AN, El-Daly A, Abdel-azizseleem A. The Effect of Intraabdominal Instillation of Lidocaine during Gynecological Laparoscopic Procedures. Med J Cairo Univ 2009; 77: 97-101.

Yon JH, Choi GJ, Kang H, Park JM, Yang HS. Intraoperative systemic lidocaine for pre-emptive analgesics in subtotal gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, double –blind, placebo-controlled study. Can J Surg 2014; 57:175-82.

Files
IssueVol 9, No 4 (December 2015) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
Keywords
Intravenous Lidocaine Intraperitoneal Abdominal Hysterectomy Pain Post Operative Lidocaine Adverse Effects

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Samimi S, Taheri A, Davari Tanha F. Comparison Between Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy, a Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study. J Family Reprod Health. 2015;9(4):193-198.