Original Articles

Companion and Type of Delivery: Inequalities in Brazil Revealed by the National Health Survey – 2019

Abstract

Objective: Birth companion is a contributory factor for humanization of labor, influencing favorable maternal and perinatal outcomes. Objective: To describe maternal and perinatal aspects of pregnancies that ended either with or without the participation of a companion during the labor period.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in Brazil using data collected from the National Health Survey (PNS-2019). Participants were Brazilian women aged 15 to 49 years who had experienced pregnancy at some point in their lives and whose most recent delivery occurred between July 2017 and July 2019. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to characterize maternal and perinatal aspects according to the participation of a companion.
Results: The target population was estimated at 5.3 million women who underwent either cesarean section (54.58%) or vaginal delivery (45.42%) between July 2017 and July 2019. The prevalence of companion support was high (84.98%), with similar rates observed for cesarean section (85.52%) and vaginal delivery (84.33%). Private health insurance coverage, the number of prenatal appointments, and the place of the last delivery were associated with differences in companion participation rates in both delivery methods. In cesarean deliveries, the presence of complications during delivery and the number of postpartum appointments also influenced companion participation rates. In vaginal deliveries, older maternal age, higher parity, and episiotomy were associated with companion participation rates.
Conclusion: The participation of a companion during labor is high and independent of the delivery method; however, socioeconomic inequalities and unequal access to quality health services persist. Initiatives to strengthen policies supporting the humanization of labor and childbirth, and to guarantee the right to a companion during delivery, particularly within Brazil's Unified Health System (SUS), are essential for expanding and making the support more equitable for women in labor.

1. World Health Organization. Companion of choice during labour and childbirth for improved quality of care [internet]. 2020. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/334151/WHO-SRH-20.13-eng.pdf (accessed 22 February 2026).
2. Kabakian-Khasholian T, Bashour H, El-Nemer A, Kharouf M, Elsheikh O; Labour Companionship Study Group. Implementation of a labour companionship model in three public hospitals in Arab middle-income countries. Acta Paediatr.2018;107(Suppl471):35-43.
3. Brasil Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos. Lei nº 11.108, de 7 de abril de 2005. Altera a Lei nº 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990, para garantir às parturientes o direito à presença de acompanhante durante o trabalho de parto, parto e pós-parto imediato, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde – SUS [Internet]. Official Gazette of the Union of Brazil. 2005. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2005/lei/l11108.htm (accessed 22 February 2026).
4. Ministério DA Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Núcleo Técnico da Política Nacional de Humanização. Humaniza Sus Visita: Aberta E Direito Ao Acompanhante. 2.ª edição Brasília: Distrito Federal; 2007. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/visita_acompanhante_2ed.pdf (accessed 7 June 2026)
5. El-Halabi S, Annerstedt KS, Agossou C, Al-Beity FMA, Pembe AB, Wanduru P, et al. Labour
companionship and respectful treatment of women during childbirth: a cross-sectional study across
16 hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. BMJ Public Health.2025;3(1):e002462.
6. Melo JPG, Santos BNSD, Amorim T, Araújo FG, Matozinhos FP, Felisbino-Mendes MS. Quality of antenatal care and parturition in Brazil: comparison between the 2013 and 2019 National Health Survey. Cien Saude Colet.2025;30(9):e13162024.
7. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2017;7(7):CD003766.
8. Bohren MA, Berger BO, Munthe-Kaas H, Tunçalp Ö. Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD012449.
9. De Mucio B, Binfa L, Ortiz J, Portela A. Status of national policy on companion of choice at birth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Gaps and challenges. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e19.
10. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics – IBGE. National Health Survey 2019. https://ghdx.healthdata.org/series/brazil-national-health-survey. (accessed 4 January 2025).
11. Stopa SR, Szwarcwald CL, Oliveira MM, Gouvea ECDP, Vieira VLFP, Freitas MPS, et al. National Health Survey 2019: history, methods and perspectives. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;20(5):e2020315.
12. Assunção G, Hidalgo L, Braga D, Quintaes V. Analysis of the PNS microdata with Survey, and PNSIBGE packages. https://rpubs.com/gabriel-assuncao-ibge/pns (accessed 22 February 2026).
13. Lumley T, Gao P, Schneider B. Package Survey - analysis of complex survey samples. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survey/index.html (accessed 4 January 2025).
14. Alves MC, Brüggemann OM, Bampi RR, Godinho VG. The support of the companion choosen by the pregnant mother in a maternity school. Rev Pesq Cuid Fundam Online. 2013;5(3):153.
15. Goiabeira YNLA, Thomaz EBAF, Lamy ZC, Santos AMD, Leal MDC, Bittencourt SDA, et al. Presence of a full-time companion in Brazilian maternities linked to the Rede Cegonha. Cien Saude Colet.2022;27(4):1581-1594.
16. Leal MDC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Bittencourt SDA, Theme-Filha MM, Leal NP, et al. Inequalities in the care for Labor and Delivery in Rio de Janeiro - Birth in Brazil Research II: national survey on abortion, delivery, and birth. Rev Saúde Pública. 2025;59(suppl1):e4s.
17. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for augmentation of labour. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/112825/9789241507363_eng.pdf , 2014 (accessed 22 February 2026).
18. Resende MTS, Lopes DS, Bonfim EG. Profile on childbirth care at a public maternity hospital. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2020; 20(3): 863-70.
19. Felisbino-Mendes MS, Santos LO, Amorim T, Costa IS, Martins EF. Does the use of pharmacological analgesia influence childbirth outcomes?. Acta Paul Enferm. 2017;30(5):458-65.
20. Cunha JF, Gama SGN, Thomaz EBAF, Gomes MASM, Ayres BVS, Silva CMFP, et al. Factors associated with breastfeeding at birth in maternity hospitals linked to the Rede Cegonha, Brazil, 2016-2017. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2024;29(4):e04332023.
21. Leal MC, Bittencourt SA, Esteves-Pereira AP, Ayres BVS, Silva LBRAA, Thomaz EBAF, et al. Progress in childbirth care in Brazil: preliminary results of two evaluation studies. Cad Saúde Pública. 2019;35(7):e00223018.
22. Monguilhott JJC, Brüggemann OM, Freitas PF, d'Orsi E. Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2018; 52:1.
23. Nunes ADS, Amador AE, Dantas APQM, Azevedo UM, Barbosa IR. Prenatal care access in Brazil: analysis of the national health research data. Rev Bras Promoç Saúde Fortaleza. 2017; 30(3):1-10.
Files
IssueVol 20, No 1 (March 2026) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
Keywords
Prevalence Companion Humanizing Delivery Vaginal Delivery Cesarean Health Surveys
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Camargo JC, de Sousa A, de Barros M, do Nascimento M. Companion and Type of Delivery: Inequalities in Brazil Revealed by the National Health Survey – 2019. J Family Reprod Health. 2026;20(1):61-70.