Hospital Performance Indicators in Provision of Perinatal Services: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Objective: Perinatal mortality is an indicating factor in social development, and international measures have been taken to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. This study aims to collect the experts’ opinions about hospitals performance in providing perinatal services and emerge the key indicators for evaluation.
Materials and methods: This is a qualitative study using the Delphi technique and based on the focus group discussion sessions with twelve experts, including pediatricians, perinatologists, neonatologists, neonatal care nurses, and midwives with at least five years of work experience. A coordinator managed the sessions, and the discussions continued until saturation. Thematic analysis was performed to extract the major themes and sub-themes.
Results: Three main themes of input/structure, process, and outcome are extracted. The input/structure theme consists of human resources, physical space, equipment, and technical support and information. In human resources, the number and proficiency of healthcare providers and mental health problems are expressed. In terms of physical space, the areas and infrastructure facilities are discussed. The proper purchase and allocation of equipment are emphasized in the equipment sub-theme. The need to establish a Health Information Service in level-one centers is mentioned in the support sub-theme. The process theme consists of medical staff retraining and empowerment, referral, follow-up, education, and audits. The maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity indices are cited in the outcome theme.
Conclusion: Our findings provide a wide range of context-specific challenges the healthcare systems face in provision of perinatal health services. As a result of this study, the primary indicators for assessing the hospitals’ performance in providing perinatal services are emerged.
2. Wimmer JE Jr. Levels of Care for Perinatal Health. N C Med J. 2020;81(1):32-35.
3. Chung JH, Phibbs CS, Boscardin WJ, Kominski GF, Ortega AN, Needleman J. The effect of neonatal intensive care level and hospital volume on mortality of very low birth weight infants. Med Care. 2010;48(7):635-44.
4. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5639.
5. Rashidian A, Omidvari AH, Vali Y, Mortaz S, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Jafari M, et al. The effectiveness of regionalization of perinatal care services--a systematic review. Public Health. 2014;128(10):872-85.
6. Kunz SN, Phibbs CS, Profit J. The changing landscape of perinatal regionalization. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(4):151241.
7. Daemi A, Ravaghi H, Jafari M. Risk factors of neonatal mortality in Iran: a systematic review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:87.
8. Atrash H, Jack B. Preconception care to improve pregnancy outcomes: The science. Journal of Human Growth and Development. 2020;30(3):355-62.
9. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/327596/.
10. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus And Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):587-97.
11. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57.
12. Boeije H. Analysis in qualitative research: Sage publications; 2009.
13. Watson SI, Arulampalam W, Petrou S, Marlow N, Morgan AS, Draper ES, et al. Neonatal Data Analysis Unit (NDAU) and the Neonatal Economic, Staffing, and Clinical Outcomes Project (NESCOP) Group. The effects of a one-to-one nurse-to-patient ratio on the mortality rate in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective, longitudinal, population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(3):F195-200.
14. Jabbari H, Abdollahi Sabet S, Heidarzadeh M. Hospital Care for Newborn Babies: Quality Assessment, A Systematic Review. Iran J Pediatr. 2015;25(5):e3706.
15. Neogi SB, Malhotra S, Zodpey S, Mohan P. Does facility based newborn care improve neonatal outcomes? A review of evidence. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(8):651-8.
16. Tamburlini G, Yadgarova K, Kamilov A, Bacci A. Improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care: the role of standard based participatory assessments. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78282.
17. Tamburlini G, Siupsinskas G, Bacci A. Quality of maternal and neonatal care in Albania, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan: a systematic, standard-based, participatory assessment. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28763.
18. Helenius K, Gissler M, Lehtonen L. Trends in centralization of very preterm deliveries and neonatal survival in Finland in 1987-2017. Transl Pediatr. 2019;8(3):227-32.
19. Lee KS. Neonatal transport metrics and quality improvement in a regional transport service. Transl Pediatr. 2019;8(3):233-245.
20. Halim A, Dewez JE, Biswas A, Rahman F, White S, van den Broek N. When, Where, and Why Are Babies Dying? Neonatal Death Surveillance and Review in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0159388.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 19, No 2 (June 2025) | |
| Section | Original Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v19i2.19302 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Health Care Delivery Health Services Research Maternal Mortality Neonatal Care Perinatal Mortality | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
