Original Articles

The Moderating Effect of Gender Role in Relationship Between Emotional Divorce and Marital Satisfaction: Comparison of Partial Least Square (PLS) and Consistent Partial Least Square Methods (PlSc) Methods

Abstract

Objective: Emotional divorce refers to a state of emotional disengagement from one's spouse, which can lead to marital dissatisfaction. Gender role conflict is a predictor of marital dissatisfaction and ultimately, divorce. The literature suggests that rigid adherence to traditional gender roles may contribute to emotional divorce. In this article, the authors aim to investigate the moderating effect of gender roles in the relationship between emotional divorce and marital satisfaction by using two multivariate methods in statistical analysis.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 539 women aged 18-65 years. The standard questionnaires used include 1) Bem Sex Role Inventory (Short form), 2) Gutman’s Emotional Divorce Questionnaire, and 3) Evaluation and Nurturing Relationship Issues, Communication and Happiness (ENRICH) Marital Satisfaction (EMS) Scale. To achieve the purpose of the study, PLS and PLSc methods have been used.
Results: The mean age and time of marriage were 33.88 ± 6.6 and 13.03 ± 7.29 years. There is a significant negative relationship between emotional divorce and marital satisfaction. The gender role of most participants in the study has been androgenic and feminine, which has increased the moderating effect of this relationship. Also, when there is a common (reflective) factor model, Consistent Partial Least Square is more likely to provide a better fit than Partial Least Square.
Conclusion: The results showed that higher women's marital satisfaction would be associated with lower emotional divorce. On the other hand, the role of gender is a mediating factor in marital satisfaction and emotional divorce. Having good male and female characteristics can have a positive impact on marital satisfaction, so increasing couples' knowledge of gender roles and trying to reduce traditional extreme roles can help increase marital satisfaction and reduce emotional divorce.

1. Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Safizadeh M, Dadvar A, et al. Marital satisfaction and emotional divorce among Iranian married individuals: A survey of hospital visitors of nine provinces. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9.
2. Fallahchai SR, Mohammadi K, Sardroodi HG. The comparison of self concept and compatibility among single and divorced women in Bandar Abbas. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine.2013; 3(2): 151-155.
3. Marringle Definition. Urban Dictionary. Available at: https://wwwurbandictionarycom/definephpterm=
Marringle.
4. Helland MS, von Soest T, Gustavson K, Røysamb E, Mathiesen KS. Long shadows: a prospective study of predictors of relationship dissolution over 17 child-rearing years. BMC psychology. 2014;2(1):1-13.
5. Sbarra DA. Divorce and health: Current trends and future directions. Psychosomatic medicine. 2015;77(3):227.
6. Falehkar A, Bordan Z, Kosha MD, Amani O, Moghadamfar N. The relationship between self-differentiation and early maladaptive schemas with marital satisfaction of divorced women. Iranian journal of nursing research. 2020; 14(6):26- 34.
7. Bokharaii A. Sociology of emotional divorce in IRAN. Tehran: Pejvak press (Persian). 2008.
8. Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Safizadeh M, Dadvar A, et al. Marital satisfaction and emotional divorce among Iranian married individuals: A survey of hospital visitors of nine provinces. Journal of education and health promotion. 2020;9(1):83.
9. Bilal A, Rasool S. Marital satisfaction and satisfaction with life: mediating role of sexual satisfaction in married women. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2020;2(1):77-86.
10. Eidelson RJ, Epstein N. Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1982;50(5):715.
11. Smart JR. Reported mental health issues and marital quality: A statewide survey: Utah State University; 2008.
12. Mller K, Hwang CP, Wickberg B. Romantic attachment, parenthood and marital. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2012;24(3):233-40.
13. Mole ML, Satisfaction in adult romantic relationships after parental divorce: the role of locus of control. Masters Thesis. 2013. Smith College, Northampton, MA. Available at: https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/617 (accessed August 2024).
14. Bem SL. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account
of sex typing. Psychological review. 1981;88(4):354.
15. Azmoude E, Firoozi M, Sahebzad ES, Asgharipour N. Relationship between gender roles and sexual assertiveness in married women. International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. 2016;4(4):363.
16. Pourshahbaz A, Ardebili ME, Dolatshahi B, Ranjbar H, Taban M. Gender role conflict: Is it a predictor of marital dissatisfaction? A cross sectional study in Tehran. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2020;34:84.
17. MacCallum RC, Austin JT. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual review of psychology. 2000;51(1):201-26.
18. Lohmöller J-B. Predictive vs. structural modeling: PLS vs. ML. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989:199-226.
19. Wold H. Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. Quantitative sociology: Elsevier; 1975. p. 307-57.
20. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing. 2019;53(4):566-84.
21. Cassel C, Hackl P, Westlund AH. Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. Journal of applied statistics. 1999;26(4):435-46.
22. Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Computational statistics & data analysis. 2015;81:10-23.
23. Goodhue DL, Lewis W, Thompson R. Does PLS Have Advantages for Small Sample Size or Non-Normal Data? MIS Quarterly. 2012;36(3):981-1001.
24. Aliakbari Dehkordi M, Shokrkon H. The Relationship between Gender Role and Mental Health & its Components in Employed Women. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2011;9(2):37-48.
25. Mami SH AM, editor Role Of self distinctiveness and attachment style in prediction of emotional divorce Congress of pathology of divorce phenomenon; 2003. (Persian).
26. Najarzadegan F, Farhadi H. The effectiveness of quality of life therapy on communication skills, addiction to cyberspace, marital satisfaction, and emotional self-regulation in couples. Journal of psychologicalscience. 2019;18(74):247-56.
27. Urbach N, Ahlemann F. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA). 2010;11(2):2.
28. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 2015;43:115-35.
29. Rasheed A, Amr A, Fahad N. Investigating the relationship between emotional divorce, marital expectations, and self-efficacy among wives in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2021;62(1):19-40.
30. Safoorai Parizi M F-DA. The mediating role of marital satisfaction in the relationship between family boundaries and emotional divorce. BiannualJournal of Islamic Psychology. 2023;8(17):112-29.
31. Curun F. Sex role orientation and romantic relationship satisfaction: A study in Turkey. Interpersona, 2012; 6(2), 227–234.
32. Matud MP, Bethencourt JM, Ibáñez I. Relevance of gender roles in life satisfaction in adult people. Personality and individual differences. 2014;70:206-11.
33. Pourmohseni Kolouri F, Zohri N, Atadokht A, Mowlaie M. The role of dark personality dimensions, self-differentiation and gender roles in predicting marital burnout. Journal of Family Psychology. 2021;6(2):43-56.
34. Mickelson KD, Claffey ST, Williams SL. The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles. 2006;55:73-82.
35. Ahangar K, Juhari R, Yacoob S, Talib M. Moderating Effect of Gender Role on the Association between Conflict Resolution and Marital Satisfaction of Iranian Married Student. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE). 2014;1(12):141-6.
36. Faulkner RA. Gender-related influences on marital satisfaction and marital conflict over time for husbands and wives: University of Georgia; 2002.
37. Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS quarterly. 2015;39(2):297-316.
38. Cheah J-H, Memon MA, Chuah F, Ting H, Ramayah T. Assessing reflective models in marketing research: A comparison between pls and plsc estimates. International Journal of Business & Society. 2018;19(1).
Files
IssueVol 18, No 3 (September 2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v18i3.16661
Keywords
Emotional Divorce Marital Satisfaction Gender Role Partial Least Square Consistent Partial Least Square Iran

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Khosravi F, Jamali J, Didehban E, Norouzi Z. The Moderating Effect of Gender Role in Relationship Between Emotional Divorce and Marital Satisfaction: Comparison of Partial Least Square (PLS) and Consistent Partial Least Square Methods (PlSc) Methods. J Family Reprod Health. 2024;18(3):188-196.