Original Articles

Comparison of Two Different Intervals of Misoprostol Administration in Second Trimester Abortions

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of two different intervals of misoprostol administration after mifepristone in second trimester abortions.
Materials and methods: This 12-month prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care facility. Only pregnancies with congenital deformity or sterilisation failure were included in the study's recruitment of 100 women who visited the hospital for a second trimester abortion between 12 and 20 weeks; cases with scarred uteri were omitted. In a systematic random selection of 50 women in each group, the administration of 200 mg of mifepristone orally was followed by two distinct intervals of intravaginal misoprostol administration at 24- and 48-hour intervals. After 24 hours, group A women received intravaginal 400 mcg misoprostol three hourly, up to a maximum of five doses, while group B received the same doses after 48 hours. Induction abortion interval noted on various parameters and paired t test and chi square test applied.
Results: The mean IAI following misoprostol administration was 8.14 2±.03 hours in group A and
7.71 ±2.56 hours in group B. This difference was statistically insignificant. Average misoprostol doses for group A were 1.68±0.71 and for the group, B were 1.68±0.84; both doses were found to be statistically insignificant when used to induce abortion. All women aborted successfully in each group. There was no significant difference in side effects in both groups.
Conclusion: Based on the results it was observed that shorter interval between mifepristone and misoprostol i.e., 24 hours can be chosen to decrease the hospital stay as there was no significant difference was seen after intravaginal misoprostol in terms of  induction abortion interval, number of doses and side effects.

Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar S. Second Trimester Medical Abortion with Mifepristone-Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone: A Review of Methods and Management. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16:162-172.
2. Lalitkumar S, Bygdeman M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mid-trimester induced abortion: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13:37-52.
3. Cooper DB, Menefee GW. Dilatation and Curettage. StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
4. Grimes DA. The Choice of Second Trimester Abortion Method: Evolution, Evidence and Ethics. Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16:183-188.
5. Tang OS, Ho PC. Medical abortion in the second trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 16:237-246.
6. Chong Y-S, Su L-L, Arulkumaran S. Misoprostol: A Quarter Century of Use, Abuse, and Creative Misuse. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004; 59:128-140.
7. Borgatta L, Kapp N. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception. 2011; 84:4-18.
8. Allen R, O’Brien BM. Uses of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology. REVIEWS IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY [Internet]. 2009 Sep;2(3):159–68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3909/riog0055
9. Magon N, Chauhan M, Goel P, Ruprai RK. The many lives of mifepristone: Multiglandular exaptation of an endocrine molecule. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism [Internet]. 2012 Jul;16(4):670–1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.98048
10. Elliott Cl, Brennand JE, Calder AA. The Effects of Mifepristone on Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Primigravidae. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:804-809.
11. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Bygdeman M, Aronsson A. Studies on uterine contractility following mifepristone and various routes of misoprostol. Contraception. 2006;74:31-35.
12. Edling A, Lindström L, Bergman E. Second trimester induced abortions due to fetal anomalies-a population‐based study of diagnoses, examinations and clinical management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100:2202-2208.
13. World health organization. Abortion care guideline [Internet]. Geneva 27, Switzerland : World Health Organization; 2022 [cited 23AD Jan 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/349316
14. Chikkagowdra S, Vanaja D, Veerendrakumar CM. Study of efficacy of mifepristone as inducing agent for mid trimester medical termination of pregnancy in women with previous cesarean section. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. 2017 Feb 3;5(9):3051–5. Available from: https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/1593
15. Heikinheimo O, Suhonen S, Haukkamaa M. One- and 2-day mifepristone–misoprostol intervals are both effective in medical termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2004;8:236-239.
16. Hou S, Zhang L, Chen Q, Fang A, Cheng L. One- and two-day mifepristone-misoprostol intervals for second trimester termination of pregnancy between 13 and 16 weeks of gestation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010; 111:126-130.
17. Nilas L, Glavind-Kristensen M, Vejborg T, Knudsen UB. One or two day mifepristone–misoprostol interval for second trimester abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86:1117-1121.
Files
IssueVol 17, No 2 (June 2023) QRcode
SectionOriginal Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v17i2.12869
Keywords
Mifepristone Misoprostol Second Trimester Abortion

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Gupta A, Gautam S, Chanana S, Sangwan N, Singhal S, Anand S, Dahiya S. Comparison of Two Different Intervals of Misoprostol Administration in Second Trimester Abortions. J Family Reprod Health. 2023;17(2):73-79.