Prevention of pregnancy complications in iran following implementing a national educational program.

  • Maryam Moghani Lankarani Mail Medicine and Health Promotion Institute, Tehran, Iran.
  • Nasrin Changizi Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mohammadreza Rasouli Medicine and Health Promotion Institute, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mohammad Amir AmirKhani Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
  • Shervin Assari Department of Health Behavior and Health Education School of Public Health University of Michigan, MI, US.
Keywords:
Iran, National Program, Pregnancy Complications

Abstract

Objective:To determine the impact of a national intervention program on some pregnancy complications in Iran.Materials and methods: this multicenter study was conducted in governmental sector in 14 provinces in Iran between 2003 and 2005. Intervention included education of all maternal health care providers including gynecologists, general physicians, and midwifes in the governmental sector. Time interval between the pre- (of 3,978 and 3,958 pregnancies) and post- (3,958 pregnancies) measurements were 18 months. Self reported data on pregnancy complications were registered. Interviews were conducted by trained personnel. Participants were interviewed when admitted for delivery or at the time attending for vaccination of their 2 month infants.Results:The following pregnancy complications were reduced significantly as compared to before intervention: 1) bleeding or spotting, 2) urinary tract complications, 3) blurred vision and severe headache, 4) premature labor pain, 5) anemia, 6) severe vomiting, 7) inappropriate weight gain, 8) endometritis, 9) urinary incontinence, 10) breast abscess or mastitis, 11) wound infection, and 12) bleeding was significantly reduced after intervention, compared to before intervention. Premature rupture of membrane showed a significant increase. These complications did not show a significant change: 1) hypertension, 2) fever and chills, 3) convulsion, shock, and loss of consciousness, and 4) obstetric fistula.Conclusion:National programs may be proved to be largely effective by decreasing some of the pregnancy complications in developing countries.

References

Chakraborty N, Islam MA, Chowdhury RI, Bari W. tilisation of postnatal care in Bangladesh: evidence from a longitudinal study. Health Soc Care Community 2002;10:492-502.

Pallikadavath S, Foss M, Stones RW. Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1147-58.

Delvaux T, Buekens P, Godin I, Boutsen M. Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. Am J Prev Med 2001;21:52-9.

Bloom SS, Lippeveld T, Wypij D. Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan 1999;14:38-48.

Kruk ME, Galea S, Prescott M, Freedman LP. Health care financing and utilization of maternal health services in developing countries. Health Policy Plan 2007;22:303-10.

Collin SM, Anwar I, Ronsmans C. A decade of inequality in maternity care: antenatal care, professional attendance at delivery, and caesarean section in Bangladesh (1991- 2004). Int J Equity Health 2007;6:9.

Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Available at: http://wwwmohmegovir/HNDC/Indicators/DHS_Eng/ MAINSWF.

Heaman MI, Newburn-Cook CV, Green CG, Elliott LJ, Helewa ME. Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008;8:15.

Villar J, Ba'aqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizan J, Farnot U, et al. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 2001;357:1551-64.

Carroli G, Villar J, Piaggio G, Khan-Neelofur D, Gulmezoglu M, Mugford M, et al. WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet 2001;357:1565-70.

McDuffie RS Jr, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M. Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;275:847-51.

Sikorski J, Wilson J, Clement S, Das S, Smeeton N. A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project. BMJ 1996;312:546-53.

Villar J, Carroli G, Khan-Neelofur D, Piaggio G, Gulmezoglu M. Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD000934.

Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2008;61:244-60.

Wu Z, Viisainen K, Li X, Hemminki E. Maternal care in rural China: a case study from Anhui province. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:55.

Tann CJ, Kizza M, Morison L, Mabey D, Muwanga M, Grosskurth H, et al. Use of antenatal services and delivery care in Entebbe, Uganda: a community survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;7:23.

How to Cite
1.
Moghani Lankarani M, Changizi N, Rasouli M, AmirKhani MA, Assari S. Prevention of pregnancy complications in iran following implementing a national educational program. J Fam Reprod Health. 8(3):97-100.
Section
Original Articles