Interventional Challenges in Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy
Abstract
Objective: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies (EPs) are rare and potentially life threatening. The number is rising due to various risk factors and there are no uniform guidelines in the management of EPs. This study was done to assess risk factors and challenges in the management of EPs.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational descriptive study that was done at SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University Dharwad, Karnataka India. Data was collected from the medical records section of all the patients of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies managed in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. The collected data were analyzed for demographic characteristics, risk factors and management.
Results: The incidence of ectopic pregnancies in our institute was 6-7 per 1000 pregnancies, of which 20% of the ectopic pregnancies were non-tubal. The incidence was higher than the other studies, which could be due to our center being a tertiary care referral center. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies were the most common accounting for 60% of cases. The management varied from conservative to minimally invasive surgery to hysterectomy hysterectomy with bilateral internal iliac artery ligation, depending upon the clinical presentation, duration of gestation, presence of fetal cardiac activity and hemodynamic stability. The other non-tubal ectopic pregnancies were cervical, ovarian, corneal and heterotopic. Cervical pregnancy beyond 12 weeks of gestation was rare which was managed by conserving the uterus.
Conclusion: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies are rare. Early diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion if missed can lead to an array of complications leading to loss of fertility, morbidity, and mortality. The key step to avert the complications is early diagnosis and individualized treatment.
2. Dheepthikaa SK, Murugan RA. Retrospective study to assess incidence of ectopic pregnancies in Saveetha Medical College and Hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 2020; 9: 4632-5.
3. Stabile G, Zinicola G, Romano F, Buonomo F, Mangino FP, Ricci G. Management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a single center experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10: 652.
4. Shah P, Shah S, Kutty RV, Modi D. Changing epidemiology of maternal mortality in rural India: time to reset strategies for MDG-5. Trop Med Int Health 2014; 19: 568-75.
5. Alalade A, Mayers K, Abdulrahman G, Oliver R, Odejinmi F. A twelve-year analysis of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: Do the clinical manifestations and risk factor for these rare pregnancies differ from those of tubal pregnancies. Gynecological Surgery 2016; 13: 103-9.
6. Dolinko AV, Vrees RA, Frishman GN. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: Overview and treatment via local injection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018; 25: 287-96.
7. Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Jonat W, et al. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013; 68: 571–81.
8. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Herman A. Ectopic pregnancies in a Caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 515-23.
9. Lin SY, Hsieh CJ, Tu YA, Li YP, Lee CN, Hsu WW, et al. New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202020.
10. Shah JS, Nasab S, Papanna R, Chen HY, Promecene P, Berens P, Johnson A, Bhalwal A. Management and reproductive counseling in cervical, caesarean scar and interstitial ectopic pregnancies over 11 years: identifying the need for a modern management algorithm. Hum Reprod Open 2019; 2019: hoz028.
11. Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 592-3.
12. Andola S, Kumar RR, Desai RM, Krutika SA. Study of risk factors and treatment modalities of ectopic pregnancy. J Family Med Prim Care 2021; 10: 724-9.
13. Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, Schneider D, Vaknin Z, Herman A, et al. “Ectopic pregnancies caesarean section scars: the 8-year experience of one medical centre,” Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 278-84.
14. Samal S, Ghose S, Pallavee P, Porkkodi P. Successful management of live cervical ectopic pregnancy: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: QD03-4.
15. Paalman RJ, McElin TW. Cervical pregnancy: Review of the literature and presentation of cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1959; 77: 1261–70.
16. Serin AN, Birge O. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy: Incidence and Diagnosis. London 2019.
17. Nedopekina E, Escura S, Cobo T, Hansson SR, Martinez JM, Figueras F, et al. Conservative treatment in non-tubal ectopic pregnancy and predictors of treatment failure. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2021; 257: 6-10.
18. Stabile G, Zinicola G, Romano F, Buonomo F, Mangino FP, Ricci G. Management of Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10: 652.
19. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 2007; 114: 253–63.
20. Michener C, Dickinson JE. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a single centre case series. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49:451-5.
21. Youssef HM, Emamb M, Zayed A. Conservative management of 14 weeks cervical ectopic pregnancy: Case report. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2016; 21: 281-4.
22. Scutiero G, Di Gioia P, Spada A, Greco P. Primary ovarian pregnancy and its management. JSLS 2012; 16:492-4.
23. Odejinmi F, Rizzuto MI, MacRae R, Olowu O, Hussain M. Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of 12 consecutive cases of ovarian pregnancy and review of literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16:354–9.
24. Ghasemi Tehrani H, Hamoush Z, Ghasemi M, Hashemi L. Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: A rare case. Iran
J Reprod Med 2014; 12: 281-4.
25. Tawab A, ElHariri MA, Abdel Ghaffari Elhariri M., Alaa AA. Heterotopic pregnancy: a case report. Egypt
J Radiol Nucl Med 2020; 51: 214.
26. Finlinson AR, Bollig KJ, Schust DJ. Differentiating pregnancies near the uterotubal junction (angular, cornual, and interstitial): a review and recommendations. Fertil Res Pract. 2020; 6: 8.
27. Brincat M, Bryant-Smith A, Holland TK. The diagnosis and management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies: a review. Gynecological Surgery 2019; 16: 2.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 16, No 1 (March 2022) | |
Section | Original Articles | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v16i1.8597 | |
Keywords | ||
Pregnancy Ectopic Pregnancy Tubal Pregnancy Medical Intervention Surgical Intervention |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |