Misbelieves about Intra Uterine Device (IUD) in Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Objective: Despite Intra Uterine Device (IUD) has the advantage of providing long-term contraception and does not require daily attention, only %8 of Iranian women use it. This study was conducted to enhance understanding of why women in the Isfahan appear reluctant to consider IUD as a contraceptive method.
Materials and methods: It was a qualitative study that was done in Isfahan in May 2009. Five urban health centers of Isfahan city were selected randomly. In each center by purposive opportunistically sampling, interview was done with referring women of reproductive age that had never used IUD without any contraindication by one interviewer. One to one semi-structured interviews were continued until a level of information saturationwas reached and no new themes were emerging. Each woman's believe about IUD and her reasons for not using IUD as a contraceptive method was asked by interviewer. Also all participants were asked about the official (leaflets, health care professionals, books and school) and unofficial (personal narratives recounted by friends and relatives) sources of their information. Eleven interviews were conducted in total. Key words in ideas of each woman were identified to develop major misconceptions about IUD use.
Results: Fear of side effects of IUD, religious believes, anxieties related to fitting of an IUD, make difficulty in intercourse and damage to fetus were the major misconceptions about IUD use. Religious believes were the most impediment factor for IUD use.
Conclusion: All of the items identified mirrored those found in other studies except the prominent worries about religious aspects of using IUD that are new and need wider exploration.
Morgan KW. The intrauterine device: rethinking old paradigms. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006; 51: 464–70.
Dean G, Goldberg AB. Approach to intrauterine contraception. 2009 updated 2009 Jun 5. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/approach–to– intrauterine–contraception–
Ahmadian R, Islami M, eds. IUD: Believes and questions. Tehran: Mehre ravish, 2010: 7.
Asker C, Stokes–Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non–users: A qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006; 32: 89– 94.
Weisberg E, Fraser IS, Goss S. The decline in popularity of the intrauterine device. A Survey of general practitioner attitudes and practices in new south wales. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 19–21.
Whitaker AK, Johnson LM, Harwood B, Chiapetta L, Creinin MD, Gold MA. Adolescent and young adult women’s knowledge of and attitude toward the intrauterine device. Contraception 2008; 48: 211–7.
WHO Department of Reproductive Health and Research.: Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. Geneva 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/.../ 9241562668index
FHI's Quarterly Health Bulletin Network.Copper T IUD: Safe, Effective, Reversible. Lack of accurate information and other barriers discourage IUD use.2000. available from: http://www.reproline.jhu. edu/english/6read/6issues/.../nt2011.html
Info for health org. New attention to the IUD outdated safety concerns and current programmatic challenges have held back use. Population reports.2006. Available from: http://www.info.k4health.org/pr/b7/published/ b7eng.Pdf.
fhi.org. Symposium to develop a comprehensive strategy for IUD repositioning. 2007. Available from: www.fhi.org/NR/.../IUDSymposiumFinalReport3Marc h092.pdf
Population council.org. Clients and providers need better support and guidance on IUDs. Ghana & Guatemala contraceptive choice. 2001. Available from: www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/orsummaries/ Orsum32.pdf.
Hubacher D.The checkered history and bright future of intrauterine contraception in the united states. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 2002; 34: 99–103.
Stubbs E, Schamp A. The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out? Family physicians, perceptions of risk and indications. Can Fam physician 2008; 54: 560–566.
Rc.racha.org. IUDs: increasing women's option, a study to provide the basis for IUD promotion. The Reproductive and Child Health Alliance (RACHA). 2001. Available from: http://rc.racha.org.kh/download. asp?...IUD–_Increasing_Women_Option...
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 4, No 4 (December 2010) | |
Section | Original Articles | |
Keywords | ||
IUD Misbelieves Isfahan |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |