<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Journal of Family and Reproductive Health">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Family and Reproductive Health</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1735-8949</Issn>
      <Volume>6</Volume>
      <Issue>3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2012</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">A Comparison Between Sublingual Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Inducing labor in Women with Term Pregnancy</title>
    <FirstPage>99</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>103</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Leila</FirstName>
        <LastName>Habibi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Mirza Khoochakkhan hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shirin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Niroomanesh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Mirza Khoochakkhan hospital; Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Laleh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghadirian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Preventive and Community medicine specialist, Centre for Academic and Heath policy, Tehran Universit</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>04</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Objective: In this study efficacy of sub lingual Misoprostol was examined in comparison to Oxytocin (I.V.) for inducing of labor in term pregnancy.
Materials and methods: Seventy patients were allocated by blocked randomization to Groups A (n=35, sub lingual Misoprostol 25 &#x3BC;g four hourly to maximum of 5 doses) and B (n=35, continuous Oxytocin infusion).
Results: Delivery active phase and total labor phase were shorter with sublingual Misoprostol in comparison to intravenous Oxytocin (p&lt; 0.001) and the rate of cesarean section was lower in Misoprostol group (p&lt;0.04) but delivery latent phase, meconium staining, uterine hypertonisity and apgar score (1&amp;5 minute) were similar in two groups.
Conclusion: sublingual Misoprostol is better than intravenous Oxytocin for induction of labor at term.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://jfrh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jfrh/article/view/151</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://jfrh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jfrh/article/download/151/151</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
