Tehran University of Medical Sciences Journal of Family and Reproductive Health 1735-8949 4 4 2010 12 15 175 178 Saghar Samimi Sade Department of anesthesiology, Women's hospital, Tehran university medical sciences, Tehran, IRAN Fatemeh Davari Tanha Department of OBS & GYN, Women's hospital, Tehran university medical sciences, Tehran, IRAN Sara Sadeghi School of medicine, Tehran university medical sciences, Tehran, IRAN 2015 10 04 Objective: To evaluate, the efficacy of sub hypnotic doses of midazolam and propofol, in prophylactic control of postoperative nausea and vomiting, in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Materials and methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 114 ASA physical status I-II parturient undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (using 0.5% bupivacaine 12 mg) were allocated randomly to receive propofol (20 mg bolus and 1.0 mg/kg/hr infusion, n=38) or midazolam (1 mg bolus and 2.0 mg/hr infusion, n=38) or saline (2 cc IV, n=38) immediately after clamping of umbilical cord. The occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting and respiratory depression was recorded during operation until 12 hr after that. Results: The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in midazolam and propofol groups compared with saline group in all 12 hr, (nausea: 19%, 15.8% versus 57.9%), vomiting (7.9%, 5% versus 34.2%). There was not manifestation of respiratory depression at the time of surgery and after it. Conclusion: Sub hypnotic dose of midazolam was as effective as the sub hypnotic dose of propofol for preventing of nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. We undertook this study in regard to examine a simple, safe and non-expensive antiemetic method. https://jfrh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jfrh/article/view/111 https://jfrh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jfrh/article/download/111/111